Salon had an interesting side story the other day about a psychotherapist who was found to be a former stripper, and who was practicing without a license:Lucy Wightman, 46, was known as a smart, warm psychologist whom patients adored for her laid-back style and her deep reserves of empathy. She had offices in two affluent Boston suburbs and her practice was thriving until last fall, when an anonymous tipster informed the local Fox affiliate that Wightman was not a licensed psychologist -- her doctorate came from a mail-order university in the Caribbean -- and in the '70s and '80s she was known as "Princess Cheyenne," one of Boston’s most renowned nude dancers.In the course of the story, this question was posed:
If you were seeing an extremely talented and helpful therapist, and then found out that he or she had lied about credentials, would you continue to see the therapist? And what if you found out that your shrink was once a stripper -- would you care?To me, the stripper part is a no brainer. It's nobody's business and irrelevant to the treatment at hand. If asked, a therapist should not lie, but may opt to not answer the question. I suspect that there are many professionals of all types who are well qualified and who have "checkered" pasts. It doesn't matter so long as they maintain the standards of their profession now.
I'm a very lucky person with every allergy known to man but still happy to be enjoying a wonderful life living in the best place in the world!