Tom Friedman, the poster boy for a Republican lite liberal journalist, writes a bunch of nonsense in today's editorial. The short version of his column is the dutifully reported GOP talking points about the Dubai port deal, namely that liberals are being racists in opposing the deal (he must be listening to Rush). Matt Yglesias has something to say about that:THE RACE CARD. Tom Friedman says skeptics of the UAE port deal are "borderline racist." David Ignatius disagrees, saying we're straight-up "racist." I say bullshit. The argument being mounted is plainly contradictory. On the one hand, it's supposed to be illegitimate to worry about this because we can't discriminate between countries. On the other hand, it's supposed to be illegitimate because the UAE is a loyal ally in the war on terror. But if the second is the reason we shouldn’t worry, then we can discriminate between countries after all. And of course we can discriminate between countries when it comes to matters of national security. That's how national security is done.So if any Iranian state owned business wanted to buy port terminals in New York, the U.S. government wouldn't have anything to do with that because to do so would be racists?
I'm a very lucky person with every allergy known to man but still happy to be enjoying a wonderful life living in the best place in the world!